Brett Kavanaugh Mobbed By Liberal Protesters

Democrats are not done having a temper tantrum over the historic overturning of Roe v. Wade.

Abortion activists have launched a campaign to “punish” those justices who voted to end federalized abortion.

TRENDING : After Biden Claimed He Can’t Stop Supreme Court

Word got out that Justice Kavanaugh and his family were enjoying dinner at a restaurant. So, a mob formed—forcing them to flee out the back.

From The Hill:

Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, one of the conservative justices who voted to overturn Roe v. Wade last month, was forced to exit through a back door of Morton’s Steakhouse in downtown Washington, D.C., by protesters who had learned he was there.

Radical abortion activists mobbed a Morton’s Steakhouse. They demanded Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh be kicked out of the restaurant, because of his role in overturning Roe.

Oh, you get ‘em Democrats! No abortion-hating judge is going to eat a steak in this town!

How petty and pathetic can they get? After Kavanaugh and his family had to slip out the back, the restaurant rebuked the actions of the radical left.

TRENDING : Trump Literally Takes To The Skies

The company blasted leftists for intruding on a person’s “right to congregate and eat dinner.” They also wrote, “There is a time and place for everything. Disturbing the dinner of all of our customers was an act of selfishness and void of decency.”

Woah. They said it better than anyone else.

Thankfully, this company refuses to bow to the woke mob. And it appears, if Kavanaugh’s family wants to return, they will receive a warm welcome by this chain.

That can’t be said of every company in this day and age. Far too many have bowed to leftist extremists, or use their business to push woke politics.

But statements like the one from Morton’s need to become much more commonplace. Radical activists cannot be allowed to harass and intimidate people, just because they disagree with them.

What purpose was this “protest” trying to achieve? The ruling was already made. This was not a petition for a “redress of grievances” as described by the First Amendment.

These were activists who just wanted to inflict pain on a judge over politics. This kind of lawless retaliation against doing the right thing must be put to an end.

TRENDING : Wisconsin Supreme Court Drops 4-3 Election Gavel