In Scottsdale, Arizona police announced they are investigation allegations against a school board president who was trying to dig up dirt parents.
The district’s superintendent announced that the school board president was trying to dig p personal financial information and naughty photos.
Police announced that they are aware of the dossier put together by Jann-Michael Greenburg and will report their findings when complete.
Greenburg had assembled a Google Drive full of personal information , documents, and photos of about 47 people to include children.
The Scottsdale Unified School District attempted to damage control by blaming the plot on Greenburg however, parents aren’t buying it and was most fo the school board to resign.
“I am calling for the immediate resignation of our board president Jann-Michael Greenburg. We cannot allow anyone in a leadership position to secretly compile personal documents and information on moms and dads who have dared speak out publicly or on social media about their grievances with the district,’ said mother Amy Carney said.
Parents believe the digital dossier was to be used to intimidate parents and threaten them should they continue to battle the school district.
Attorney Alexander Kolodin of the Davillier Law Group expressed his concerns about the situation with the Scottsdale Unified School District.
“These allegations are deeply troubling, especially as concerns the photography of a minor child without parental consent and the taking down of license plate numbers of parents who Mr. Greenberg supposedly perceived as political opponents,” Kolodin said. “Mr. Greenberg is an elected member of the school board. If such a photograph was taken with his express or tacit consent, he would potentially be liable for violations of Arizona’s Parents’ Bill of Rights, which recognizes a parent’s ‘fundamental’ right to consent before the government makes a video or voice recording of the minor child.”
“Both Arizona and the federal government have laws prohibiting both intimidation generally and voter intimidation in particular such as ARS Titles 13 and 16, the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, the Civil Rights Act of 1957, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965,” Kolodin said. “If these allegations are true, Mr. Greenberg and his father might be liable for violating one or more of these laws – though it is difficult to say from the limited facts that have been reported and they must, of course, be presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.”